Legal Opinion

Hoekstra v. Hopkins

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1925No. Appeal 74PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

Defendant appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff in a scire facias sur mechanic’s lien. Plaintiff filed his claim, under the Act of June 4,1901, P. L. 431, against defendant’s house and the curtilage appurtenant thereto for work and labor furnished and supplied towards the erection and construction of the alterations and additions to defendant’s dwelling — which had been damaged by fire — consisting of preparing and furnishing necessary preliminary sketches, physical surveys of the premises and working drawings for the alterations and additions and remodeling of said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dyer v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Bank of Pennsylvania v. GriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
  3. Rush v. AbleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  4. St. Clair Coal Co. v. MartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
  5. Price v. KirkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alan Porter Lee, Inc. v. Du-Rite Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Silfies v. AustinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Huck-Gerhardt Co., Inc. v. DaviesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Collins v. Matoaca Tribe, No. 376 of Improved OrderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Columbia Produce Co., Inc. v. TiskowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API