Ulrich v. Mercedes-Benz USA, 23550 (9-26-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
This cause was heard upon the record in the trial court. Each error assigned has been reviewed and the following disposition is made:
{¶ 1} Appellant, Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, appeals the judgment of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas, which purportedly entered judgment against appellant after a jury trial. This Court reverses and remands.
I
{¶ 2} Appellee, Thomas Ulrich, filed a complaint against appellant regarding a Mercedes-Benz automobile, alleging two counts of breach of warranty under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, and one count alleging a violation of…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Larson v. LarsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Lakota v. LakotaOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Ulrich v. Mercedes-Benz USA, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Dixon v. O'BrienOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Keller v. KellerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.