Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Criminal Court o£ Marion County (39,280); James A. Pritchard, Judge. Prosecution by the State of Indiana against The Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. Prom a judgment of conviction, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
Prosecution, by indictment, against appellant for violation of the act of March 8, 1909 (Acts 1909 p. 441), commonly called the “automatic bell-ringer act”. Motion to quash indictment overruled. Appellant entered'a plea of not guilty, and also filed a special plea in writing. Trial by the court, resulting in a finding of guilty. Motion for a new trial overruled. Motion in arrest of judgment overruled. Judgment on finding for $100 and costs. Prom that judgment this appeal is prosecuted.
The alleged errors relied on for reversal are: (1) Overruling motion to quash the indictment; (2) overruling…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. BarrettIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Knight & Jillson Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Ford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- State v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Bright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- West v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- Bass v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
- State v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
- Department of Insurance v. SchoonoverIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.