Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1913No. 22,248PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From Criminal Court of Marion County (40,277); Joseph T. Market/, Judge. Prosecution by the State of Indiana against The Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. Prom a judgment of conviction, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

Appellant was charged by affidavit with the violation of §§ 1, 2, 3 of the act of March 1, 1911 (Acts 1911 p. 92). Section 1 applies the provisions of the act to any corporation, person or persons “while engaged as common carriers in the transportation of passengers or property within this state to which the regulative powers of this state extend.” Section 2 prescribes the kind of caboose which shall be used after June 1, 1914, and §3 provides that, “Whenever any such caboose cars or other cars now in use by such common carriers as provided by section 1 herein shall after this act goes into…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Matter of Stubbe v. . AdamsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Dutton Phosphate Co. v. PriestSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  3. State Ex Rel. Mavity v. TyndallIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Vandalia Railroad v. StillwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. State v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API