Legal Opinion
Maloney Packing Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.
Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided February 5, 1947No. 334PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGRUDER, Judge.
Maloney Packing Company, complainant, challenges the validity of a provision of Amendment No. 2 (9 F.R. 1820) to Regulation No. 3 (8 F.R. 10826) issued by the Defense Supplies Corporation, under which provision respondent has ruled that complainant was ineligible, during the period November 1, 1943, to March 4, 1944, to receive the special subsidy of 800 per cwt. payable to non-processing slaughterers of cattle.1
Amendment No. 2 established a special subsidy to non-processing slaughterers pursuant to a Directive of the Economic Stabilization Director issued October 25, 1943 (8…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Earl C. Gibbs, Inc. v. Defense Supplies CorporationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
- Atlantic Meat Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Emergency Court of Appeals · 1946
- Illinois Packing Co. v. HendersonEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
- Somerville Dressed Meat Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Emergency Court of Appeals · 1947
3Cited by5 opinions
- Earl C. Gibbs, Inc. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Emergency Court of Appeals · 1948
- Belle City Packing Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Emergency Court of Appeals · 1948
- Flour Mills of America, Inc. v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1950
- Service Pipe Line Company, a Corporation v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1954
- King Packing Co. v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1952