Somerville Dressed Meat Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

MAGRUDER, Judge.

This complaint challenges the validity of a provision of Amendment No. 2 (9 F.R. 1820) to Regulation No. 3 (8 F.R. 10826) issued by the Defense Supplies Corporation, under which provision respondent has ruled that Somerville Dressed Meat Company, complainant, was ineligible, during the period November 1, 1943, to January 17, 1944, to receive the special subsidy of 80<) per cwt. payable to nonprocessing slaughterers of cattle.1

Amendment No. 2 established a special subsidy to non-processing slaughterers pursuant to a Directive of the Economic Stabilization Director issued…