Legal Opinion

New York & Cuba Mail S. S. Co. v. Lamborn

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 19, 1926No. 368PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHand, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The answer pleads an agreement to move the Manta to Matanzas and a breach. That defense wholly broke down on the trial, and if we were disposed to stand upon the pleadings the ease would be at an end. However, this suit is in the admiralty, and the variance between the defense as pleaded and that proved does not appear to us fatal. The charterers’ only possible excuse is that an owner, being advised that his charterer cannot load within the lay days, ought to grant his request to move the vessel elsewhere, so as to keep the loss as low as possible. This,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wicker v. HoppockSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Warren v. StoddartSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. WR Grace & Co. v. Panama R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  4. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co. v. LillardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
  5. United States v. Sugarland IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yone Suzuki v. Central Argentine Ry., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  2. Continental Grain Co. v. Armour Fertilizer WorksDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
  3. Montauk Oil Transportation Corp. v. Sonat Marine, Inc., and Getty Refining and Marketing Company, Sonat Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  4. Edison Steamship Corp. v. Eastern Minerals, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API