Legal Opinion
Chappell v. International Brotherhood Electrical Workers Local Union 772
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided July 31, 2015No. Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-02153PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARY G. LEWIS, District Judge.
Before this Court is Defendant International Brotherhood .of Electrical Workers Local Union 772’s (“Local 772”) Motion for Summary Judgment brought pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 52.) Local 772 submits that summary judgment should be entered in its favor on all counts of the Amended Complaint brought by Plaintiff Kirk Chap-pell (“Plaintiff’). Having considered the motion and responses, the arguments of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS Local 772’s Motion for Summary Judgment. ■
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. HechlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v. RawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chappell v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 772Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Monica Simone Fennell v. Portus Terminals LLC, SSA Atlantic, LLC, Southeast Crescent Shipping Company, Marine Terminals Corporation -— East, International Longshoremen’s Association, International Longshoremen’s Association Local 1426, and Fred Spain, Jr.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2026
- Pyatt v. International Longshoremen's Association Local 1422District Court, D. South Carolina · 2024
- Pyatt v. International Longshoremen's Association Local 1422District Court, D. South Carolina · 2025