Legal Opinion

Graham v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Hillsboro

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 7, 1924No. 43. [fn*]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarcus, J.

On January 28, 1914, appellant purchased from appellee a tract of land in Hill county, and as part of the consideration therefor executed his five notes, the first due January 1, 1915,' and one on the 1st of •January of each year thereafter, the last note being due January 1, 1919; each being for the sum of $273.25. The first two notes were paid. On March 17, 1922, appellee filed this suit to recover on the last three notes, due January 1, 1917, 1918, and 1919, respectively.

Appellant pleaded the four years’ statute of limitation with reference to the notes due January 1, 1917 and 1918, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edwards v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Headlee v. FryerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Tullos v. MayfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Poole v. CageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. McCutcheon & Church v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Citizens' National Bank v. GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Hutton v. HarwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Hillsboro v. GrahamTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API