Legal Opinion
Spruks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 17, 1943No. 8102PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Circuit Judge.
The unsuccessful claimants to a fund in the registry of the District Court appealed from the decree of the court below in bankruptcy adjudicating the ownership of the fund. The appellants filed a supersedeas bond in the sum of $5,000 as they were required to do by the order of this court granting them leave to appeal. The present defendant was the surety in the bond. This court affirmed the decree of the District Court (In re Northumberland Min. Co., D.C., 16 F.Supp. 63, affirmed Thomas et al. v. Spruks, 3 Cir., 89 F.2d 998). Certiorari was applied for and denied.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Thornton v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- In Re Washington & Georgetown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Chauncey v. Dyke Bros.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Boyce's Executors v. GrundySupreme Court of the United States · 1835
- Lyon v. Perin & Gafe Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rector v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
- Moss v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962
- Tully v. KerguenDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1969
- MacDonald v. Winfield Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.