Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. Winfield Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1952No. Civ. A. No. 8708Published

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff obtained an injunction ordering the defendant to turn over to it certain patents and documents and forbidding ■the defendant to carry on certain business practices, D.C., 93 F.Supp. 153. The defendant appealed and obtained a stay of the mandatory portions of the injunction by filing a supersedeas bond. The condition of the bond was that the defendant “shall satisfy the said judgment in full together with costs, interest and damages for delay if said appeal is dismissed or if the judgment is affirmed.” The decree of this Court was affirmed. The defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Washington & Georgetown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Woodworth v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
  4. MacDonald v. Winfield CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Estate of GleesonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API