Legal Opinion
Henry v. Norwalk Tire & Rubber Co.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided June 19, 1935No. File #47414Published
1Opinion of the CourtCornell, J.
Reasons of appeal 1 and 2 advance the claim that the Commissioner erred in refusing to add to his finding, the subject-matter of paragraphs 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 of claimant’s motion to correct the finding.
The Commissioner granted the first paragraph of paragraph 4 of the Motion to Correct. The part of it which he refrained from adding to the finding embodies the conclusion that at the time the quarrel arose, the deceased was on the premises making preparations to begin his duties at the appointed hour.
It is, perhaps, not of decisive importance what time the deceased had entered the engine room on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jacquemin v. Turner & Seymour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Procaccino v. E. Horton & SonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Corvi v. Stiles & Reynolds Brick Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Moran v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Boulanger v. First National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932