Borjan v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
PER CURIAM.1
The appellant was found guilty of the offense of aggravated rape of a child and assessed a punishment of twenty-five years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. See § 22.021, Tex. Penal Code. A majority of a panel of the Fourth Court of Appeals reversed the appellant’s conviction on the basis of an improper jury argument during the punishment phase. Borjan v. State, 715 S.W.2d 94 (Tex.App. San Antonio 1986, pet. granted). The State’s argument was held to be “outside the record, called upon the jury to speculate…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Cortez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Landry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by340 opinions
- Hawkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Cooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Poole v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
335 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.