Legal Opinion

Forbes Lithograph Manuf'g Co. v. Worthington

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided January 8, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

At Law.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

This case was submitted by the parties on an agreed statement of facts, from which it appeared that the plaintiffs, a corporation located at Boston, in the district of Massachusetts, imported into that port by different steamers, in 10 different lots, certain merchandise described in the invoices and entries as “iron show-cards.” These cards were prepared in different colors on plates of sheet-iron. They were lithographed, or printed from lithographic stones, on hand-presses, in the same way that lithographing is done on paper or on card-board. On this merchandise,—that is, on these “iron…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maillard v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Arthur v. UnkartSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Jeffrey v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Arthur v. MollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Arthur v. JacobySupreme Court of the United States · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zanola v. HallCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
  2. Alpers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  3. Smith v. Maud Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Cobbs v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. Zanola v. HallCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API