Byers v. Locke
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
It is alleged in the complaint that the plaintiff, being the owner of certain real estate which had been sold under a decree of foreclosure, made an agreement with the defendant, just prior to the expiration of the time for redemption from said sale, that the defendant should advance the money necessary therefor and redeem the property from said sale, and for the pur*494pose of enabling him to do so, he would convey the premises to the defendant, and that the defendant should hold the same until such time as they might be sold, and in the mean time advance such moneys as might be necessary for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- M'Crea v. PurmortCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
- Michael v. . FoilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Bowen v. BellNew York Supreme Court · 1823
- Belden v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
- Shephard v. LittleNew York Supreme Court · 1817
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bates v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- CALDWELL ET UX v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Hicks v. PostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y. v. Fresno Flume & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Pollyanna Homes, Inc. v. BerneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.