Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Phillips

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 13, 1995No. 94-0359; CMR No. 9200239Published

1DissentSullivan, Chief Judge

I respectfully dissent.

30. I would hold that trial defense counsel was ineffective in the sentencing portion of the trial in failing to provide the Chaplain’s Handbook and the Wiccan Bible after being given 48 hours by the judge to do so. Moreover, I would find that Specialist Phillips was prejudiced by counsel’s incompetence because the military judge refused to find that deprivation of Wiccan religious materials amounted to pre-trial punishment. Having found that the defense counsel was ineffective here and that appellant was prejudiced by this, I would give relief under Strickland v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API