Legal Opinion

Southern States Life Ins. Co. v. Dunckley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 11, 1933No. 4 Div. 666PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

Bill by Southern States Life Insurance Company, appellant here, to cancel a certain policy of insurance, issued by it on the life of W. W. Dunckley, with Mattie Lou Dunckley, wife of the insured, as the beneficiary. The policy contained double indemnity and disability clauses, and was issued as of date January 24, 1928. The stated theory of the bill is: (a) The insured made false statements as to his health in his application for the insurance, and in answer to questions by the medical examiner; and (b) that there was a breach of warranty in the “good health clause” as…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Phoenix Life Ins. Co. v. RaddinSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Insurance Co. v. WolffSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Viele v. Germania InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  4. Queen Insurance v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  5. United States Life Insurance v. LesserSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jackson National Life Insurance v. RececoniNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Margie C. Barnes v. Atlantic & Pacific Life Insurance Company of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  3. English v. National Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. BrandtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API