Legal Opinion

Petition and Articles of Ass'n for Reorganization of Squaw Creek Drainage District No. 1 v. Rayl

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment purporting to reorganize Squaw Creek Drainage District No. 1 and extending its charter for a period of fifty years from May 22, 1920, under the provisions of the Act of March 24, 1913, concerning drains and levies. [Laws of 1913, p. 232.] The district was originally incorporated on May 22, 1900, for a period of twenty years under sections 6517-6530, both inclusive, Revised Statutes 1889, and amendments thereto. The charter therefore expired on May 22, 1920, and as this proceeding was started on May 18, 1926, it is claimed by the appellants, who are owners of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Winningham v. TruebloodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  2. Buschling v. AckleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  3. Birmingham Drainage District v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  4. Janney v. SpeddenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  5. Stanton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte AndrewsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Watts v. GrossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API