Legal Opinion

Union Properties, Inc. v. Patterson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1944No. 29633PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

There is no doubt that the trial court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and that the proceedings were not void ab initio for want of -power to hear and determine. See State, ex rel. Young, v. Morrow, Judge, 131 Ohio St., 266, 278, 2 N. E. (2d), 595, and State, ex rel. Nolan, v. ClenDening, 93 Ohio St., 264, 112 N. E., 1029. Although- the trial court had full power to act, a jurisdictional phase was imparted to the judicial inquiry by the contention of the defendants that a conflict of jurisdiction between the trial court and the Probate Court prevented the relief prayed for. That…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Young v. MorrowOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Hull v. VaughnTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Thomas v. Morristown State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Fremont Farmers Union Cooperative Ass'n v. MarkussenNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Johnston v. Byars State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lakeshore Motor Freight Co. v. Glenway Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Doss v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. In re Estate of MasonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. WilloughbyOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Cheff v. Athlone Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API