Lanham v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of South Carolina, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUFF, Judge:
Melvin Lanham appeals the summary dismissal of his action against Blue Cross and Blue Shield of South Carolina. In the action, Lanham alleged breach of contract and bad faith in the cancellation of his health insurance policy. The circuit court judge granted Blue Cross’s motion for summary judgment on the grounds Lanham knew of his liver condition and misrepresented his health status at the time he submitted his application or alternatively that Lanham had a long-standing problem with his liver which materially affected Blue Cross’s acceptance of the risk. We reverse.
FACTS
On…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cafe Associates, Ltd. v. GerngrossSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Wells v. City of LynchburgCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Taylor v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
- Clyburn v. Sumter County School District 17Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
- Meyer v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jimmy Myrick v. Prime Insurance Syndicate, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Lanham v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Olson v. Faculty House of Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. KellyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Jimmy Myrick v. Prime Insurance Syndicate, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.