Legal Opinion
Fidenas AG v. Honeywell Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 6, 1981No. 77 Civ. 4761 (GLG), 77 Civ. 5598 (GLG)PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge:
In these two actions, which have been treated as consolidated for purposes of these motions, plaintiffs allege that they were , injured by a “multinational fraud” consisting of the issuance, sale, and subsequent dishonoring of approximately $10,-000. 000 of fraudulent notes. They also allege that those responsible for the fraud include not only Roland Staempfli (“Staempfli”), a Swiss citizen, and his employer, Honeywell Bull (Schweiz) AG (“HBS”), the Swiss corporation whose notes were involved, but also Companie Honeywell Bull S.A. (“CHB”), HBS’s French parent;…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,590 David Segal v. Lawrence Gordon, and Coburn Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Fischer v. MaloneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Friedman v. Arizona World Nurseries Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Crystal v. FoyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Quintel Corp., N v. v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Posner v. Coopers & LybrandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Computer Strategies, Inc. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.