Legal Opinion

(PC) Singh v. Blizzard

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 31, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00024Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAGHVENDRA SINGH, No. 2:23-cv-0024 KJM DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 THADD A. BLIZZARD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Raghvendra Singh is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to 18 the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending 19 before the court are plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, 20 amended complaint, motion to appoint counsel, and motion to stay these proceedings. (ECF Nos.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API