North River Insurance v. Ohmer
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By HORNBECK, PJ.
This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment in favor of the defendant.
The case arose in Municipal Court and was tried to a Judge without intervention of a jury.
• There is but one substantial question presented, namely, did the trial judge, in determining the case, apply an unsound principle of law.
On October 26, 1934, George L. Coleman was the owner of a 1934 Chevrolet car then one month old. It was stolen on that date. Mr. Coleman carried a policy with plaintiff assuring against loss occasioned by theft of the automobile. The car was recovered a day or so…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Central Mutual Insurance Co. v. WhetstoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Ins. v. Alms & Doepke Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1944
- Edwards v. Crestmont Cadillac Corp.Shaker Heights Municipal Court · 1979
- Homlar v. Great Lakes Towing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1944