Legal Opinion
State v. Hinkel
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 31, 1984No. CX-83-2059PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
In this appeal, we must determine whether a search warrant permitting police to search the premises of a building and all persons on the premises, authorized in connection with an investigation aimed at an “after hours joint”, permitted a search of appellant Dennis Hinkel, who was found on the premises. We must further determine whether the search of appellant was justified as a precautionary weapons search. We reverse.
FACTS
On May 27, 1983, a warrant was issued authorizing a day or night unannounced search of the premises at “162 N. Kent Street, St. Paul, Minnesota,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HinkelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. DoyleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
- State v. DoyleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996