Legal Opinion
Behrens v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 22, 1933No. Docket No. 4960PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
This cause is before us upon a petition for a writ of certiorari to be directed to the above-named Superior Court, for the purpose of reviewing a certain judgment entered in said court wherein one J. E. Pauly was plaintiff and A. H. Behrens, G & PI Commercial' Service, Inc., and Fred M. Harter and Bruce Goodman were defendants.
It appears from the petition and return that on or about the twelfth day of May, 1932, an action was begun in the Justice’s Court of Camptonville Township, County of Yuba, by J. E. Pauly against the petitioners herein. Judgment went for the plaintiff Pauly against the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Christerson v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Crouch v. H. L. Miller & Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Young v. RosenbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Tyrrell v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Associated Oil Co. v. MullinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Estate of KeetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Hunter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Moran v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Cowan v. District Court of First Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1957
- Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.