Legal Opinion

State v. Castle

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 1994No. 2812PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reece, Judge.

Appellants, Steven Shonk and Eileen Ross, appeal from the Wayne County Municipal Court’s order finding them in contempt of court for failure to obey subpoenas requiring their appearance as witnesses. We affirm.

On February 18,1993, Danny D. Castle was charged with menacing by stalking based on a series of harassing phone calls. The police had traced one of these calls to the apartment where Shonk and Ross lived. Shonk and Ross told police that Castle had been alone in their apartment on the day of the traced call.

On February 26, 1993, the Wayne County Municipal Court issued…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Denovchek v. Board of Trumbull County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. City of Cleveland v. RamseyOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MoodyOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. EatmonOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Gzk, Inc. v. Schumaker Ltd. PartnershipOhio Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API