Legal Opinion · Dissent

Louis Perez v. William Stephens, Director

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 26, 2014No. 13-70002, 13-70006Published

1DissentJames L. Dennis, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent.

Ordinarily, “the attorney is the prisoner’s agent, and under “well-settled principles of agency law,’ the principal bears the risk of negligent conduct on the part of his agent.” Maples v. Thomas, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 912, 922, 181 L.Ed.2d 807 (2012). However, the Supreme Court has explained that “[a] markedly different situation is presented[ ] ... when an attorney abandons his client without notice, and thereby occasions the default.” Id. (emphasis added). “Having severed the principal-agent relationship, an attorney no longer acts, or fails to act, as the client’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API