Legal Opinion

Grady v. . Parker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 15, 1947PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Tbe defendants do not challenge tbe validity of tbe deed of trust or tbe present right of enforcement, nor do they dispute tbe effectiveness of tbe judgment against Mrs. Parker on tbe note. They do contend that tbe order of foreclosure, made while Rose, trustee in tbe deed of trust, was not a party to tbe proceeding, was void; and that tbe order attempting to cure its invalidity by making Rose a party by relation nunc pro tunc before tbe order was made is beyond tbe present power of tbe court, and at best could only make tbe trustee a party for some subsequent action in tbe premises as might…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bynum v. . PoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. Godwin v. . MondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. Hughes v. . HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. Brown v. . MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Atlantic National Bank v. Peregoy-Jenkins Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Underwood v. OtwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Page v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. EAST CAROLINA LUMBER COMPANY v. Pamlico CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Grady v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API