Legal Opinion
In re State's Attorney
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 11, 1979PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
The dispositive issue in this case is whether a customer of a bank has the requisite standing to appear and contest the legal sufficiency of a subpoena duces tecum issued to a bank employee to produce records of the customer’s transactions, under General Statutes § 54-22, Connecticut’s enactment of the Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Without a State in Criminal Proceedings.1
Pursuant to § 54-22, a certificate signed by a judge of Cook County, Illinois was presented on August 10, 1978, to the Superior Court for the County of Hartford. In the certificate, the Illinois…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Anderson v. LudginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Hurlbut v. LemelinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- United Aircraft Corporation v. FusariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. NixonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. SomervilleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. DupreeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Federal Aviation Administration v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.