Artieta v. Artieta

The plaintiff’s claim to be reimbursed the sum of $493 00, which he alleges to have paid for the defendant, is substantiated to the amount of $457 21. The evidence in the record leaves no doubt upon this point. So far, the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed.

The defendant, averring that the plaintiff' has slandered him, claims in reconvention the sum of one thousand dollars for damages. The District Judge allowed him two hundred dollars.

The plaintiff’s conduct in calling the defendant, his brother, a rogue, within the hearing of some bystanders, is certainly very reprehensible. But…