Legal Opinion

Olkowski v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-6172PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BECHTLE, District Judge.

Presently before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s motion will be granted and defendant’s motion will be denied.

I. FACTS

The parties have stipulated to all the relevant facts. The defendant is an insurance company. The plaintiff was furnished by his employer, M & S Foreign Car Service (“M & S”), with group term health and life insurance coverage under an “Employer Plan,” underwritten by the defendant. Under this policy, both the plaintiff and his wife had health care insurance coverage. All…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Poch v. Equit. L. Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Snader v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Hanaieff v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Peyton v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Best v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nationwide Life Insurance v. American Medical Imaging Corp. (In Re American Medical Imaging Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Perry v. Middle Atlantic Lumbermens Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. DePasquale v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Perry v. MIDDLE ATL. LUMBERMENS ASS'NSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API