Legal Opinion

Gray v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 4, 1897No. 359PublishedCited by 21 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.

1Opinion of the Court

(xILBEBT, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error was the plaintiff in an action in the circuit court, brought against the executors of the Iasi: will and testament of Edgar Mills, deceased, to recover damages for the breach oí a contract of conveyance of real estate. It was alleged in the complaint, in substance, that on October 7, 1891, the plaintiff entered into and signed written agreements with Edgar Mills, whereby be agreed to sell and convey to said Mills, by good and sufficient deed, free of all incumbrance, and the said Mills agreed to buy from him, a certain lot of land situated on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Wright v. . Bank of the MetropolisNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Eddy v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Townshend v. GoodfellowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Carpenter v. HolcombMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  2. Backman v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Wells v. PageOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. Catlin v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1908

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API