Legal Opinion

Grupo Industrial Camesa v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided February 15, 1994No. Court No. 93-04-00236Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion and Order

DiCarlo, Chief Judge:

Defendant United States, joined by defendant-intervenor, the Committee of Domestic Steel Wire Rope and Specialty Cable Manufacturers, moves to strike the brief of plaintiff-intervenor, the Wire Rope Importers’ Association (WRIA). Defendant’s motion is granted pursuant to USCIT R. 81(m).

Background

This action contests the final affirmative determination by the International Trade Commission (ITC) in the antidumping investigation of Steel Wire Rope from the Republic of Korea and Mexico, 58 Fed. Reg. 16,206 (March 25, 1993). Plaintiff-intervenor initially…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API