Legal Opinion

Domenico v. Alaska Packers' Ass'n

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 9, 1901No. 12,239PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit to recover a balance claimed for wages.

1Opinion of the Court

DE HAVEN, District Judge.

This is a libel in personam, brought by a large number of persons to recover each the sum of $50, balance due for wages as fishermen and seamen, upon a contract alleged to have been entered into between them and the defendant corporation on May 22, 1900, at Pyramid Harbor, Alaska. The answer of the defendant sets forth three defenses: First, the defendant avers that the contract referred to in the libel is without consideration; secondly, denies that it executed such contract; and, for a third 'defense, it is alleged that the labor performed by the libelants was done…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hackley v. HeadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Vanderbilt v. . SchreyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Rollins v. MarshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  4. King v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. Ayres v. C., R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1879

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alaska Packers' Ass'n v. DomenicoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
  2. Wood v. Kansas City Home Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Alaska Packers Ass'n v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Sandanger v. Carlisle Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Tisdale v. BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API