Domenico v. Alaska Packers' Ass'n
District Court, N.D. California
In Admiralty. Suit to recover a balance claimed for wages.
1Opinion of the Court
DE HAVEN, District Judge.
This is a libel in personam, brought by a large number of persons to recover each the sum of $50, balance due for wages as fishermen and seamen, upon a contract alleged to have been entered into between them and the defendant corporation on May 22, 1900, at Pyramid Harbor, Alaska. The answer of the defendant sets forth three defenses: First, the defendant avers that the contract referred to in the libel is without consideration; secondly, denies that it executed such contract; and, for a third 'defense, it is alleged that the labor performed by the libelants was done…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hackley v. HeadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Vanderbilt v. . SchreyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Rollins v. MarshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- King v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Ayres v. C., R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1879
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Alaska Packers' Ass'n v. DomenicoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
- Wood v. Kansas City Home Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Alaska Packers Ass'n v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Sandanger v. Carlisle Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Tisdale v. BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.