Legal Opinion

Byndom v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 5, 2001No. CR 00-59PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JIM HANNAH, Justice.

Appellant Gregory Charles Byndom appeals his rape conviction, arguing that the trial court erred in finding the victim, Shaneani Mason, competent to testify at trial. The State cross-appeals, asking this court to hold that the trial court erred in disallowing Mason to use a computerized augmentative communication device while she testified and further arguing that the trial court erred by concluding that Byndom’s prior Illinois voluntary manslaughter conviction did not subject him to second-strike status under Arkansas law. We affirm on direct appeal and dismiss on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. State v. GallowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Logan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. King v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Clem v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Brady v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Modlin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Samontry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API