Legal Opinion

Pieri v. Director of Motor Vehicles

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 22, 1963No. 3229PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge.

Following an automobile collision petitioner was charged in the Court of General Sessions with several offenses including driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Pending disposition of those charges he was served by the Director of Motor Vehicles with notice to show cause why his permit should not be suspended or revoked. At a hearing on this notice there was testimony by the arresting officer that immediately after the collision petitioner had a strong odor of alcohol, was incoherent in speech and was unable to tell what had happened; and that petitioner…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Silver v. McCameyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  2. Ernest S. Jenkyns v. Board of Education of District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bungardeanu v. EnglandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Quick v. Department of Motor VehiclesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Lister v. EnglandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Griffin v. HeathDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Bungardeanu v. EnglandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API