Legal Opinion

United States v. I. James Bednarski, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 22, 1971No. 7706PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, Chief Judge.

The basic question in this case, whether a court may be required to accept a plea of guilty, calls for a rather detailed statement of the facts. The defendant, who operated a nursing home, was indicted on six counts for fraudulent income tax returns. After extensive discovery and pre-trial proceedings counsel notified the court that defendant was willing to plead guilty to count 5, the United States Attorney stating that upon such a plea he would dismiss the other counts. Pursuant to F.R.Crim.P. 11 the court addressed the defendant and inquired if any threats or promises…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Lynch v. OverholserSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. James A. McCoy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  4. Joseph Griffin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  5. John Henry Maxwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Louis Ammidown, United States of America v. Robert L. AmmidownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  2. Ross v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. United States v. Justo Fernan MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. Victor Manuel Alvarez, United States v. Diana MatosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Honorable Jim R. Carrigan, United States v. Daniel G. Landry, United States v. Otis Elevator Company and Daniel G. LandryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API