Legal Opinion

United States v. Honorable Jim R. Carrigan, United States v. Daniel G. Landry, United States v. Otis Elevator Company and Daniel G. Landry

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 3, 1985No. 85-1530, 85-1536 and 85-1541PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

The United States (the Government) and Daniel G. Landry appeal from an order of the district court rejecting what the court described as a proposed plea agreement between the Government and a corporate defendant, Otis Elevator Company (“Otis”), and what the Government characterizes as a motion to dismiss defendant Landry. The Government also seeks a writ of mandamus directing the district court to accept the proposed disposition of the case against Landry. The Government claims that the district court exceeded its authority when it rejected the agreement. We disagree…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Rafael Pimentel, Amabledeyes Dejesus, Julio Dejesus, Juan Dejesus, Amabledeyes Dejesus, Julio Dejesus, Juan DejesusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. In RE LEROY RICHARDS, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. In Re MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API