Legal Opinion
Chester Upland School District v. Edward J. Meloney, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 15, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY BENDER, J.:
¶ 1 Gillan & Hartmann, Inc. (Architect) appeals from the order denying its motion for summary judgment and granting Edward J. Meloney, Inc.’s (Contractor) cross-motion for summary judgment on Architect’s claim for indemnification for costs and attorney’s fees incurred in defending itself in a lawsuit against it and Contractor brought by the Chester Upland School District (School District). For the following reasons, we affirm.
¶ 2 The facts of this case are as follows. The School District contracted with various parties, among them Contractor and Architect, for the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Craley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Widmer Engineering, Inc. v. DufallaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Minnotte AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- PBS Coal, Inc. v. Hardhat Mining, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Michael, G. v. Stock, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Huron Consulting Services, LLC v. Physiotherapy Holdings, Inc. (In re Physiotherapy Holdings, Inc.)District Court, D. Delaware · 2015
- Burlington Coat Factory v. Grace ConstructionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Burlington Coat Factory v. Grace ConstructionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015