Legal Opinion
Donahue v. PIKES PEAK AUTOMOBILE COMPANY
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 11, 1962No. 19849PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Moore.
The parties appear in the same order as in the trial court and will be referred to as they there appeared or by name as follows: James F. Donahue, doing business as Airlines Cab Service, as Donahue; Pikes Peak Automobile Company as Pikes Peak; The Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company as Massachusetts; and The Columbia Casualty Company of New York as Columbia.
Two claims are set forth in the amended complaint, the first being against Pikes Peak in which it is alleged in essence that Pikes Peak operated in unlawful and unauthorized competition with Donahue in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Julius Hyman & Co. v. Velsicol Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Donahue v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- Westesen v. Olathe State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tull v. Gundersons, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- A to Z Rental, Inc. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Peterson v. Colorado Potato Flake & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- C. J. Goldammer, L. K. Goldammer, and C. Jack Goldammer, D.B.A. Dairy Queen of Colorado v. Ralph E. Fay and Ruth E. FayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- City of Westminster v. Centric-Jones ConstructorsColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.