Legal Opinion

Bett v. City of Lackawanna

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff, disabled while performing his duties as a fireman in 1971, was paid his full salary by the city until he failed to report for light duty in 1979 (see, General Municipal Law § 207-a [3]), at which time his employment was summarily terminated. In plaintiff’s action for damages and a declaratory judgment ordering continuation of his salary, the trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, holding that the city had never…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Faliveno v. City of GloversvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Uniform Firefighters v. City of CohoesNew York Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Bett v. City of LackawannaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API