Legal Opinion

Uniform Firefighters v. City of Cohoes

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*728OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold J. Hughes, J.

Petitioners, “nonworking firefighters” who have been out of work for extended periods while receiving their salaries pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-a, challenge respondent City of Cohoes’ (Cohoes) order that they return to “light-duty work” pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-a (3). Although all petitioners were examined by a physician and found fit to return to “full work” or “light-duty work”, and individual petitioners admit spending their time golfing “15 or 16 holes”, driving to and from Florida, cooking, ironing, cleaning laundry and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Price Paper & Twine Co. v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Curley v. DilworthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Legg v. FitzmauriceNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Leone v. Sheriff's DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Cohoes v. Uniform Firefighters of Cohoes, Local 2562New York Supreme Court · 1998
  2. D'Agostino v. DiNapoliNew York Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API