Spinning v. Millsite Steel & Wire Works, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, C. J.
Plaintiffs sued separately, each on a promissory note executed by defendant. The cases were consolidated for trial before the court without a jury, and on this appeal. The defense was (and is) that plaintiffs had each entered into a composition agreement with defendant to accept 10 per cent, of their respective claims in full settlement. These so-called agreements were identical (except as to names and amounts) as follows:
“The undersigned creditor of Millsite Steel & Wire Works,' Inc., a Michigan corporation, of Howell, Michigan, does hereby agree to and with such corporation and other…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Browning v. CrouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Aston v. ElkowMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Shekell v. Ypsilanti Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Central Steel & Wire Co. v. FarberMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thal v. Detroit Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1946