Legal Opinion

Spinning v. Millsite Steel & Wire Works, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1943No. Docket No. 27, Calendar No. 42,213PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, C. J.

Plaintiffs sued separately, each on a promissory note executed by defendant. The cases were consolidated for trial before the court without a jury, and on this appeal. The defense was (and is) that plaintiffs had each entered into a composition agreement with defendant to accept 10 per cent, of their respective claims in full settlement. These so-called agreements were identical (except as to names and amounts) as follows:

“The undersigned creditor of Millsite Steel & Wire Works,' Inc., a Michigan corporation, of Howell, Michigan, does hereby agree to and with such corporation and other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Browning v. CrouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Aston v. ElkowMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Shekell v. Ypsilanti Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Central Steel & Wire Co. v. FarberMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thal v. Detroit Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API