Legal Opinion

Browning v. Crouse

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1879PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Superior Court of Detroit. Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

In December, 1875, Crouse was indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of $1,131.50, and was also indebted to others beyond his ability to make full payment. Under these circumstances he made to his creditors a proposition for a compromise, the substance of which - was that he should pay fifty per centum of his debts and be discharged from the payment of the remainder. ■ A certain sum was to be paid immediately, and for the remainder secured notes were to be given at three, *341six and nine months, with interest. The method of security was agreed upon, but we need not give the particulars here.…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Keller v. Paulos Land CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Lutz v. DutmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Rosenthal v. RamboIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. O'Toole & Nedeau Co. v. BoelkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Murphy v. Frank P. Miller CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API