Legal Opinion

Holler v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1984No. 17168-PRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

140 Ariz. 142 (1984)

680 P.2d 1203

Richard L. HOLLER, Petitioner Employee,

v.

INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Mort's Body Shop, Respondent Employer, State Compensation Fund, Respondent Carrier.

No. 17168-PR.

Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc.

March 21, 1984.

Tretschok, McNamara & Clymer, P.C. by Dale D. Tretschok, Tucson, for petitioner.

James A. Overholt, Chief Counsel, The Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix, for respondent.

Robert K. Park, Chief Counsel, Phoenix, State Compensation Fund by Smith Michael, Tucson, for respondents Employer & Carrier.

CAMERON, Justice.

We granted a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nielson v. FlashbergArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Allen v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  3. McKaskle v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. Hamer v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Holler v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API