Legal Opinion
Solar v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 6, 1981No. 77 Civ. 5689(MP)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILTON POLLACK, District Judge.
Defendant Kollsman Instrument Company (“Kollsman”) has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. dismissing Count I of the complaint. The motion is predicated on the resolution by the governmental agency, the defendant Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) of questions of motivation and credibility in favor of Kollsman on the basis of which the Agency applied the relevant provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. in favor of Kollsman. The latter is entitled to summary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 103, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Civil Aeronautics Board v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Frisco Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Consolidated Litigation Concerning International Harvester's Disposition of Wisconsin SteelDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Department of Energy v. HuntTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1986
- Solar v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Solar v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Solar v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981