Legal Opinion

United States v. Dumas

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 13, 2000No. 99-1658PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge.

Appellant Roland Marshall Dumas was convicted in a jury trial of conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1988). The district court (Woodlock, J.) imposed a sentence of 262 months imprisonment, and denied Dumas’s Motion for New Trial and Revised Motion for New Trial based on newly discovered evidence. Dumas appeals this ruling denying his motions for a new trial.

On appeal, Dumas presents two instances in which he claims the district court abused its discretion in denying his motions for a new trial, which we address…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. McCambridge v. HallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. Ramos-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  4. Seahorse Marine Supplies, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  5. Conley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API