Legal Opinion

Nationwide Insurance v. Estate of Kollstedt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1995No. 93-942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The issue that has been certified to this court by the Twelfth Appellate District is “whether, within the context of an intentional injury exclusion clause in an insurance contract, insanity should be defined pursuant to R.C. 2901.01(N) or Turner, supra [29 Ohio App.3d 73, 29 OBR 83, 503 N.E.2d 212].”

R.C. 2901.01(N), effective July 24, 1990, provides that “a person is ‘not guilty by reason of insanity’ relative to a charge of an offense only if he proves * * * that at the time of the commission of the offense, he did not know, as a result of a severe mental disease or defect, the wrongfulness…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cuervo v. Cincinnati InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Nationwide Ins. Co. v. Estate of KollstedtOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Cuervo v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Sanders v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Krewina v. United Specialty Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API