Legal Opinion
State v. Brokaw
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 17, 1993No. 11114PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of cocaine with the intent to sell by person who is not drug-dependant in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b).1 The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion to suppress evidence by improperly ruling that he was not illegally seized in violation of his rights under the fourth amendment to the United States constitution and árticle first, § 7, of the Connecticut constitution, (2) denied his motion for a mistrial which was based on the state’s improper…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. OquendoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CarterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Cohen v. Town Plan Zoning, Bloomfield, No. Cv92-0506760 (Sep. 3, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
- State v. BrokawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. Dieppa, No. Cr14-423111 (Jun. 28, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994