Legal Opinion
McCarthy v. Bentley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 6, 1905PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Error from the Probate Court of Caddo County; before M. N. Gish, Trial Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Beauchamp, J.:
On the 3rd day of October, 1903., the defendant in error, D. Bentley, filed his petition in the probate court of Caddo county, praying judgment upon an attachment bond executed by "the Williamson-Halsell-Hrasier Co., and the plaintiff in error, J. B. McCarthy, for the sum of $235.00, for damages for wrongfully causing an attachment to be levied upon certain personal property belonging to defendant in error. Answer was filed by the Williamson Halsell-Frasier Co. and McCarthy. The case came regularly on for trial on the 25th day of January, 1904. Bentley…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Menten v. ShutteeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
- McMechan v. ChristySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Lookabaugh v. La VanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- City of Kingfisher v. PrattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tribal Development Co. v. White Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Homeland Realty Co. v. RobisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Green v. Incorporated Town of YeagerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Stonebraker-Zea Cattle Co. v. HiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Guess v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.